> It would significantly help your point if the conspiracies you were citing were not plain old unsubstantiated bullshit.
What's unsubstantiated about it? Jack Dorsey admitted he censored the story from the New York Post incorrectly and only after the election did they reinstate the ability to share the article.
The computer shop owner who had the laptop had the signed receipt from Hunter Biden. Hunter himself admitted he's under investigation by the FBI for tax fraud.
The drug and sex pictures in the laptop were not the most incriminating material. It was the emails to foreign powers selling his father's influence as Vice President and a longstanding senator that is the real damning stuff.
Now, if you have a laptop containing emails selling your significantly political parent's influence to foreign interests then that might be of interest to the general public. If you just gave stupid pictures of yourself doing drugs then nobody cares.
I think his laptop is nobodies business and there are many privacy violations against Hunter Biden just because he is the son of a president you might or might not like.
But this is pretty much a conspired removal of content.
