Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Wow, that's kinda crazy. It essentially means that companies can hurt competitors by violating a law, causing competitors to go out of business even, and then pay the government to 'repent' (and also agree to some scrutiny for that particular type of violation). But their objective of wiping out competition has been achieved.



I'm not sure what that has to do with remittance; you seem to be suggesting that a larger fine should have been assessed. And, sure.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: