They won't be running them, of course, just have long term contracts with the companies that make them. Check out NuScale Power[1]. They recently had their small reactor approved in the US (approval paperwork cost $500 million dollars) and they should have some of them running soon. The reactor can be built in a factory and is small enough to be delivered in one piece via truck. This will dramatically reduce construction costs, if they can get enough orders. Why buying and deploying 1000 of these is not in the climate bill is just crazy if climate change is the huge threat people claim it to be. I think global warming is going to be a big problem; bring on the nukes.
I agree with you that all sorts of nuclear power is going to be important in dealing with climate change.
I still disagree with the types of people that run crypto and are ideologically opposed to any kind of common sense regulation being let anywhere near nuclear power.
Here's [1] what happened when those people got something comparatively harmless like a cruise ship. I really don't think it sets a good precedent.
I really don't want those same kinds of people running nuclear reactors so I can read about how crypto scheme X literally blew up.