Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's apparently (based on an anecdote of 1 - further research appreciated) very straightforward to get meteorite coverage on your insurance - just ask for it and you'll get it added at no extra cost. I have no idea why it is that this one rare event is so straightforward, but I have a friend who gets it added to every policy he purchases and he's never had any resistance.


I can see why it might be free for a conventional policy, but surely it can't be free for an arbitrarily large policy? An interesting case of rounding working out in your favor if true.


I do think large properties - stadiums, skyscrapers, etc - fall into their own weird category when it comes to insurance.

I mean, what happened with the twin towers and the other affected buildings, not to mention the tens of thousands of people that died or were injured as a consequence, in terms of insurance?


IIRC, this turned into a large and complicated reinsurance claim case because they couldn't work out if the second plane hitting counted as a separate event, or if both planes should be counted as the same attack. This made a big difference in terms of who should pay whom, and what amount.


> if both planes should be counted as the same attack.

Why would it be counted as a same attack, two planes hit two seperate buildings so they are two separate events.


Why (or indeed why not) it would be counted as the same attack is exactly the point of the case I described.


Must be hard for insurance brokers to add meteorite coverage and keep a straight face.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: