A is the unchanged inclusion of the license statement including the attribution.
Sorry. You are not free to strip a MIT license.
(Even, if this would not be the explicitly stated in the license, everything adhering to any kind of publication would still apply. E.g., pretending that the work of others having originated genuinely from you would be considered as plagiarism.)
Edit: To make this clear, the question of license violation has nothing to do with the question of plagiarism. These are on entirely different levels. One is about use, the other is about authorship. (As it happens, the MIT license has also something to say about any note of authorship included in the license statement.)
Sorry. You are not free to strip a MIT license.
(Even, if this would not be the explicitly stated in the license, everything adhering to any kind of publication would still apply. E.g., pretending that the work of others having originated genuinely from you would be considered as plagiarism.)
Edit: To make this clear, the question of license violation has nothing to do with the question of plagiarism. These are on entirely different levels. One is about use, the other is about authorship. (As it happens, the MIT license has also something to say about any note of authorship included in the license statement.)