I am saying I fully reject the means of NIMBYism, nevermind the ends.
But yes, I would be against reducing park space.
In this case I thought GP was celebrating the move for preserving park space, perhaps because this building isn't on the pier but just land? But I am not sure.
The building, 550 washington, is huge and on land. Pier 40 is next to it, (towarss the west) across the NYC west side highway. Pier 40 is mostly on water as the name implies
Building being sold does not reduce park space. It fact that building was an eyesore before redevelopment. Now, I contend it makes it more likely that thanks to the new tenants,Pier40 will have a major facelift
But yes, I would be against reducing park space.
In this case I thought GP was celebrating the move for preserving park space, perhaps because this building isn't on the pier but just land? But I am not sure.