Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

When speaking of "ancient times" we should really define more precisely who do we talk about - there were a huge differences between say citizens of Ancient Rome and some tribesman culture of Amazonia in terms of exposure to the pathogens.

We nowadays live in more sterile conditions, but we also live in a way bigger communities than ever, with significantly more population mobility - which makes us on average potentially exposed to a much wider spectrum of different germs in one's lifetime than it was a case ever before. When modern ppl get in contact with isolated tribes, although they're living whole lives in totally non-sterile conditions, it's almost always the modern people who will make them sick, not the other way around.



That’s true, but the claim was that getting respiratory viruses is good for overall health, because sterility is bad.

Sure, our germs make isolated people sick, but are we healthier because of the respiratory viruses, or are we merely germier?

OP seems to be arguing the hygiene hypothesis applies to respiratory pathogens.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: