Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Yeah, which always felt like that would be a great reason to formally verify...If a race condition ends up draining my account of all my money, you can bet that I am going to sue for the lost funds and probably a bunch of other things, which I cannot imagine would be very cheap for the bank. In fact, I would think it would be expensive for them even if it wasn't their fault (e.g. maybe there was no money in my account because I just have bad spending habits and a bad memory).

It seems to me that having every bit of evidence on their end to prove that they are guaranteeing our transactions would be a really good thing....I suppose this solution might just work itself out if banks actually start relying on some kind blockchain to secure their transactions.




> which I cannot imagine would be very cheap for the bank

Its cheaper for everyone for them to say oops and give you the money back.

Its more expensive for you to sue than for them to be sued.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: