Well, not more. Sending a comment takes you down to zero, you're done. Unless that person likes your comment. Popular posts or number of likes per comment would be irrelevant. The idea I guess is to allow and even encourage a friendly back and forth without burning all your credits.
Example.
A -I released this tool!
B - Wow nice how long did that take
A - Thanks, 6 months.
At this point, the conversation is done unless both like each other's comment, which in such an exchange would be encouraged.
If C comes along and says 'this tool sucks', even if 50 people like it, if A doesn't, C is done commenting for the day.
In fairness, I haven't really thought the whole thing out in detail, just some rough ideas. I appreciate pointing out challenges and dislikes with it though.
Very interesting idea. C can still come back and comment the next day/after a fixed time frame. I think it provides a much needed balance between lack of interaction and over interaction. I guess it can prevent bickering and unnecessary arguments.
Though if anyone wanted to set up an information farm, by creating a bunch of accounts, where they post and like each other, acting like different individuals, it could still create engagement with other innocent people who could eventually become biased, hateful and misinformed.
Unfortunately this doesn’t help with flame wars where people can go over to a sub thread they get agreement on to harvest credits to then brigade the ones they disagree with.
This doesn't work in the described way. Commenting takes you to zero, only one person could agree to take you back to 1.
So going to a subgroup of your likeminded people would do nothing. You can comment 'like me pls', which would take you from one credit to 0. The responder liking it would take credit back to 1, which is where it was initially. So, nothing gained.
However, one would have to solve the multiple account problem, which every site has to deal with.
Example. A -I released this tool!
B - Wow nice how long did that take
A - Thanks, 6 months.
At this point, the conversation is done unless both like each other's comment, which in such an exchange would be encouraged.
If C comes along and says 'this tool sucks', even if 50 people like it, if A doesn't, C is done commenting for the day.
In fairness, I haven't really thought the whole thing out in detail, just some rough ideas. I appreciate pointing out challenges and dislikes with it though.