Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's crazy how advanced some UK technology was back then. Designing afterburners in 1943. And then canceling just before completion of the aircraft.

The same happens in many cases. What's a successful breakthrough is usually not only technological. UK was extremely indebted after the second world war, mostly to USA. https://www.exchangerates.org.uk/articles/1325/the-200-year-...

Of course there was the wider sad story of management problems in UK industry and the long decline after the war.




The UK is also the only nation to successfully produce an orbital-class spacecraft then cancel their space program.

Our inability to follow through in recent decades can be depressing.

Hopefully SABRE/Skylon doesn't turn out to just be vaporware.


I grudgingly give credit to the British for being very clever (magnetron, battle of the beams, etc.) during and after WW2.

Having said that, London had food rationing for 9 years after the war, and really didn't have the money or facilities that the Americans had. (A B-29 was used as the mothership for the X-1!)

The W article below mentions "After the rocket plane experienced compressibility problems during 1947, it was modified with a variable-incidence tailplane following technology transfer with the United Kingdom."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_X-1

Additionally, around half the X-plane pilots died, so Britain avoided a lot of test pilot fatalities. The US poured unlimited funding and talent into the program, with everybody being stars/aces (Yeager, Hoover, etc.) Both were injured seriously and almost died in various X-plane tests.

One X-plane test pilot set a record, then just quit and started a gun range.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: