The premise is that CSVs are in widespread use and not suitable for their used purposes.
The conclusion is that there are many binary formats which are more suitable, except that none are used widely enough, and the post even goes on to not make a recommendation. Finally it says that we have to accept this sad state:
"Ultimately, even if it could muster the collective will, the industry doesn’t have to unify around a single successor format. We only need to move to some collection of formats that are built with machine-readability and clarity as first-order design principles. But how do we get there?"
The conclusion is that there are many binary formats which are more suitable, except that none are used widely enough, and the post even goes on to not make a recommendation. Finally it says that we have to accept this sad state:
"Ultimately, even if it could muster the collective will, the industry doesn’t have to unify around a single successor format. We only need to move to some collection of formats that are built with machine-readability and clarity as first-order design principles. But how do we get there?"