You think the burden of proof isn't (or shouldn't be) on the government?
Between your wilful "reading between the lines" based on your own biases, and smug insults ("But, hey... you do you"); I don't think this argument is going to go anywhere - I don't see the "accept that you may be wrong and are willing to be corrected" you talked about.
No, because scepticism doesn't imply we should.
> Ah, yes. Inverting the onus of proof is fun.
You think the burden of proof isn't (or shouldn't be) on the government?
Between your wilful "reading between the lines" based on your own biases, and smug insults ("But, hey... you do you"); I don't think this argument is going to go anywhere - I don't see the "accept that you may be wrong and are willing to be corrected" you talked about.