Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I always thought PBS and NPR were pretty good. What am I missing?



NPR has an implicit assumption in ~every story that a problem is best addressed by government intervention and spending. They're credulous of any claim an "authority" makes.

Two quick examples from npr.org right now:

1. Somehow we can model how the economy can adapt to zero carbon in 40 years yet couldn't predict changes to solar PV becoming more affordable in the last ten: https://www.npr.org/2021/08/14/1027370891/climate-change-sol...

2. Could this article be more sympathetic to the administration? https://www.npr.org/2021/08/14/1027552833/heres-why-biden-is... the meanest thing they say it's "misjudged the speed". Why not "it's been obvious for two decades ANA could never hold together including the eight years he was VP"


And another acting as if an exorcism was a real thing: https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2015/07/30/4249800...

It's more benign than qanon. I haven't checked their coverage of mask wearing. I'll change my mind if they were pushing masks when Fauci was lying and saying they were unnecessary.


The key line in this story might be:

> Father Syquia leads a team of four priests who get additional assistance from volunteers: psychiatrists, doctors, lawyers and laypeople.

There seem to be some trained professionals hidden behind the show and prayers.


QAnon is benign, we wouldn't even know of its existence if it wasn't constantly brought up by press outlets to supply their readers with a desperate need for a boogeyman.


Yeah, not sure what that guy's on about. PBS, NPR, and other not for profit news orgs like BBC aren't perfect, but then what is? If I had to choose a single news source to try to stay informed, I'd take any one of those three over any of their for-profit competition.


Don't mistake the BBC for a "not-for-profit". BBC Worldwide is a commmercial operation. The BBC has large shares in various commercial TV operations.

The only parts of the BBC that are arguably not-for-profit are iPlayer, and domestic TV and Radio; and the BBC World Service. These are paid for by a controversial hypothecated tax, controlled by the government of the day; as a consequence, the Beeb is fairly consistently pro the government of the day, and anti the official opposition (they can see which side their bread is buttered on).

[Edit] The World Service is paid for out of general taxation, specifically the Foreign Office budget. It's not paid for out of the Licence Fee.


According to the author's examples of bullshit, NPR peddles the same stuff as the other for-profit main stream publications.

> Immerse yourself in news of Russian plots to counterfeit presidential children’s laptops [0], viruses spawned in Wuhan market stalls [1], vast secret legions of domestic terrorists flashing one another the OK sign in shadowy parking lots [2] behind Bass Pro Shops experiencing “temporary” inflation [3], and patriotic tech conglomerates purging the commons of untruths.

I listed to them for years but noticed a considerable shift in their reporting in the last 2-3 years.

[0] https://www.npr.org/2020/10/17/924506867/analysis-questionab...

[1] https://www.npr.org/2020/01/29/800725826/why-wet-markets-are...

[2] https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2021/01/15/957421470...

[3] https://www.npr.org/2021/07/17/1017264502/the-federal-reserv...

[4] https://www.npr.org/transcripts/959667930


>According to the author's examples of bullshit

That's the author's definition of bullshit though, it doesn't necessarily constitute actual bullshit.


Well, first of all, that they are 1/1000000 of the news produced by mainstream sources.


In Europe they have a good market share, easily double digit.


Huh? Who in Europe listens to NPR?


They were presumably not referring to NPR specifically, but to public-service broadcasters in general, like ARD and ZDF in Germany, BBC in Britain, ORF in Austria, RAI in Italy, and so on.


Most of them (including BBC) are the same crap the article laments, RAI four times so.


I wasn't arguing editorial merit. This was about them having a large market share, which they do.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: