That's pretty strange, considering e.g. this paper for quite some time ago: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p022... which is written as if anonymous structs always were a thing.
I wonder if there isn't a deep confusion somewhere where "anonymous" and "unnamed" mean different things to different persons.
That's pretty strange, considering e.g. this paper for quite some time ago: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p022... which is written as if anonymous structs always were a thing.
I wonder if there isn't a deep confusion somewhere where "anonymous" and "unnamed" mean different things to different persons.