>> (iirc Samsung is currently making chips in Texas actually, but that's relatively recent)
Samsung has been making chips in Austin, TX since late 1990's and by mid-90's the company was making most of Apple's APs there -- remember when Tim Apple defended its China outsourcing practices by pointing out that "the engines" of their portable devices were in fact made in the US in a rare CBS interview in early 2010? Apple quickly switched to TSMC in Taiwan after that.
It seems like Samsung in turn turned their Austin production to mostly memory production lines (and some logic chips for Tesla) after Apple left for China/Taiwan.
People who care about 'American chips' aren't distrustful of Taiwan or South Korea. In fact, they are really good allies to us.
What we are worried about is China's increasingly large Navy, their raw ambition, and the weakening of the US Navy (due to budget cuts planned out decades ago).
China may decide to attack Taiwan, which would cause Taiwan to lose chip production, which would hamper the US.
TSMC making a backup fab in the USA would be beneficial to both Taiwan and the USA. If Taiwan gets attacked, they can still supply chips.
It's about physical security afforded by the US mainland. It's a lot harder for China to attack Arizona than it is to attack Taiwan.
> the weakening of the US Navy (due to budget cuts planned out decades ago
Relative to the height of the Cold war, sure, but the US Navy still has 5 times more ( and much bigger) aircraft carriers than the next navy; and leads the other navies with similar multiples in submarines, various types of ships, airplanes, rocket and anti-rocket capabilities etc. etc.
The US Navy has a decent-ish chance in an engagement with the Chinese Navy for at least the next few decades, assuming the engagement takes place outside of the range of the Chinese air force.
> The US Navy has a decent-ish chance in an engagement with the Chinese Navy for at least the next few decades, assuming the engagement takes place outside of the range of the Chinese air force.
The issue with Taiwan is that any realistic engagement of China vs Taiwan means that Chinese Navy is in 100% support of its Air Force.
You're right. US Navy still dominates China outside of its missile / air force range. But China likely sees an opportunity to make a move vs Taiwan within the next 10 years (before this US Navy issue is patched up with the next generation of warships).
The next stage for China vs US potential combat isn't Madagascar... its Taiwan. A nation that's well within range of China's cruise missiles, air force, and mainland (so easily resupplying Chinese Navy). The US would be fighting with significant disadvantages if a Taiwan war were to ever break out.
This isn't about jobs, but control. GloFo can pull out/dismantle/sell any time.