Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I used to work at JPL, and I was there when the sky-crane (the system currently used to land rovers on Mars) was first proposed back in the late 90s. I remember thinking to myself, "That is the craziest idea I have ever heard, there is no way that could possibly work." But it did.

Never bet against NASA engineers. Sure, they have the odd high-profile screwup, but on the whole they are shockingly competent.




Do you know if there is any test footage of that anywhere? That's, to me anyway, the second most amazing thing about the sky crane...that I can't find a single frame of it in operation on earth.


Earth physics are different from Mars physics. What works there wouldn't work here; can't just try it out and see if it works.


Sure the final mission configuration isn't exactly what they would test, but the differences in the sky crane maneuver on Mars and Earth would be relatively easy to factor in (ok, that might be an exaggeration, but its doable). There is a ton of control development that would need to be sorted out so they knew how to integrate it all. For example, I had heard that the primary indicator that the rover had touched down simply watching the throttle on the closed loop flight control system. When it throttled down it meant the rockets were no longer suspending the weight of the rover. If true, I would think you would want to test that quite a bit...

FWIW they tested missile defense 'kill vehicles' on the ground and they will operate at or near orbital velocity in space. The main 'hover thruster' would likely be completely unnecessary in a live exercise:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBMU6l6GsdM


would it have had enough thrust to work in earth gravity?


Sorry I have no idea.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: