Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

At that point, if you have the land for it, why not just go for an "efficiently sized" home. Like 500-700 sqft.


It's a big waste of energy to cool and heat a house bigger than you really need, an ethical problem in this day and age (global warming).


True, although a lot of smaller houses/tiny homes will use mini splits for their heating/cooling, which are significantly more energy efficient than central AC units. Insulation is also relatively cheap. Solar is an option to offset it as well, although extra insulation is a much easier and cost effective option here (at least in the short term).

Most houses that are classified as tiny are in the 200-400sqft area, so while a "small home" is about twice as large at 500-700sqft, we gotta remember that most houses are 1500sqft anyways, so we are still coming out ahead.

Plus, I think it's much much easier to convince the average joe to live in a 500-700sqft home than in a 200-400sqft home.


This is their first unit. If they keep going it sounds like they are planning to offer homes with more rooms. I hope so - If they had a two bedroom (so I can use the other bedroom as an office) one bath I'd be all over it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: