I'm glad to see something coming in this space. I had been very sad to see DabbleDB go away, and Google Fusion Tables, Google Refine, and Google Docs Spreadsheets seem promising yet somewhat neglected, unfocused, and disjoint.
Surely, though, there must be a more descriptive term for this than a "social network"? Even though you could consider it (to some degree) to be a social network, Github doesn't describe itself as one.
Help us find better words. We hate it at least as much as you do. If someone told me two years ago that I'd be passionately building a social network in 2011, I'd have laughed in their face.
That said, it's inarguable that you all knew what we were talking about, even if you groaned. That's what we're up against.
All I can ask is that you suspend your judgement and assume that this is the effort of people with a clue. We're motivated to be loved, not hated.
If I were going to describe this to a friend, I'd probably say "like flickr, but for data"... not something you can put in marketing materials, I know.
I'd like to abuse this reply to ask that when you add tools for geodata, that you please please please do what you can to help people produce visualizations and rankings that are not horribly skewed by poor choices of geographic boundaries.
I know this is a hard problem, but for people who don't do this all the time, it's really easy to end up with a headline like "Manhattan Leads the City in Pedestrian Deaths Per Square Mile, Study Finds" (Manhattan is, of course, the densest borough in New York City, so this probably isn't terribly useful information). I've seen maps that might show, for example, the areas of the US with the highest number of coffee shops per square mile, but the map is done based on counties, so here in Seattle we end up not looking terribly dense since over half of gigantic King County is mountainous and unpopulated.
1. Give us good feedback on the things you care about, and we'll listen. We're a small team and we're listening to everything people tell us.
2. We're specifically not providing tools that create visualizations. There's a hundred startups and software products that already do this. BuzzData is where you put your visualizations and articles and apps when you're done.
How about just calling yourself a community ("We are a community passionate about liberating and sharing useful data on the web.")? Everyone understand what it means, it has a familiar touch to it and very few would oppose it as being to web2-y.
I read your blog and discovered ScraperWiki through it (thanks!) so it makes a lot of sense that you're primarily focusing on structured and re-usable data.
Would love to see some big picture blog post on the web data gathering and transformation eco system, e.g. how all the different tools/services - scrapers, rss, FreeBase, Yahoo Pipes, InfoChimps, etc - can be used in real business cases. Right now there seems to be a rich rhizome growing but the big picture issues are hidden beneath the soil.
Just an aside, but you specifically explain the proper spelling of your name as "BuzzData", but your logo uses a lowercase "d" while still using an uppercase "B", i.e. "Buzzdata" instead of "BuzzData". Not important, just thought I'd point out the discrepancy.
Surely, though, there must be a more descriptive term for this than a "social network"? Even though you could consider it (to some degree) to be a social network, Github doesn't describe itself as one.