I feel scammed when practitioner of the art tries to sell me on his model "learning physics of the simulation. Look, it even figured out where to put the shadow".
Have you seen the video? The author even goes as far as suggesting the technique might useful for (generating?) entire operating systems at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udPY5rQVoW0&t=853s. That's just wild.
I suggested there could be a "future where many game engines are entirely or even mostly AI based like this. Or even things like operating system or other programs."
The thought here was just a wondering of what the future might be and if we might have far more AI based programs.
I still think the answer is a strong yes, this is a glimpse into the future. No where did I say GameGAN would be that engine. You're just trying your hardest to hate.
Manipulative much? I don't hate you (well, so far), you aren't being attacked, I'm just noting what a few informed people here don't like about your video. No, they aren't trolls. And, yes, everyone has different level of tolerance to exaggerations, of course.
Odd, pretty sure it was you who misrepresented what I said in attempts to manipulate.
You were also the one who "exaggerat[ed]" my claims. I made a general statement about my thoughts about future AI-based software rather than human-coded.
I still think that's indeed the inevitable future. Doesn't seem like it's remotely outrageous or an exaggerated. I never said GameGAN would be that software, but you seem to want to make that be the case so you can put it down.
What makes you believe neural networks aren't or could not be deterministic? What makes you think NNs could not eventually produce far more robust, reliable, and secure operating systems?
Seems obvious to me, but I guess you're more informed than me :)
You, like many youtubers, made completely exaggerated claims in your commentary. Your model fits a sequence of inputs to a video frame. But you say "wow look it even models the movement of the sun!". It's pretty absurd.
