Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I try to provide some amount of reason, mostly just so if someone on the fence reads they can at least see some amount of argument against a bad idea, but the originator of the bad idea is only going to double down on their take.



That is very reasonable for debate.

But deciding to armchair-quarterback what somebody knows about their own mental health is frankly not a debate just an attack and a pretty silly one at that.


But you don't _know_. You're undiagnosed. You _think_. You read a book that resonated with you and decided you had ADHD without seeking a legitimate diagnosis. That's not _knowing_.

Continuing to spread the idea that any unqualified person can just decide they have a mental health disorder without seeking help from _legitimate professionals_ in that space is negligent. I'm attacking the negligent spread of harmful information about mental health, as _obviously_ people that are struggling with mental health conditions _should seek qualified help_.

I'm glad the book you read helped you find some amount of clarity or made you feel better. That's great!


No, I _know_. It is, after all, my mind.

Possibly, for yours, you need a doctor to rattle off 10 questions and write down your answers.

But me, for mine, I am content to read the 10 questions written by the doctors for me to interpret myself.

The fact that you don't realize you are being offensive is just so... chef's kiss.

Please continue your crusade against negligence elsewhere. You've added absolutely nothing here.


> No, I _know_. It is, after all, my mind.

The arrogance of this statement is astounding.

> The fact that you don't realize you are being offensive is just so... chef's kiss.

I'm certain that you're offended by my statements, but only because of your aforementioned arrogance. Telling unqualified individuals to seek help from qualified individuals about matters regarding mental health isn't offensive. I'm sorry that I don't have the faith in random unqualified individuals that you do.

> Please continue your crusade against negligence elsewhere. You've added absolutely nothing here.

I ended our conversation previously and you chose to revive this discussion. You're welcome to see yourself out whenever you're ready.


I’m not offended, but you are being offensive. Your whole approach here is toxic. I’m here attached to my actual identity talking about real mental health issues, and you hide behind a pseudonym without a trace of identity and question another’s own experience based on nothing but your opinion.

Why needlessly call-out, contradict and argue? This, my comment here, was a share out, it took some courage to post it, none of it was about or impacted you. You took it upon yourself to be the critic. So to that I say, buzz off. You’re unwanted.

> created: 82 days ago

Yup. This checks out.


"My account is older than yours so you have to put up with whatever mindless nonsense I post"

No thanks. Enjoy your older account. I can't possibly care any less about your actual identity and any perceived significance you think sharing a username across websites gives you. It's also not my opinion that totally unqualified individuals cannot take the place of legitimate doctors.

Best of luck. I won't be continuing this thread. I really am glad that book helped you and really do hope that you someday seek legitimate treatment.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: