They worked on a Smalltalk-inspired VM (OOVM) in the early 2000s. So I don’t think they claim that running a dynamic language interpreter is a new invention, ulisp, MicroPython, or otherwise.
I don’t know ulisp. I believe with MicroPython you basically have one monolithic Python application running in the interpreter on the device. I believe their claim is that their system enables you to have several applications run in their interpreter with reasonable isolation between them. So I think it’s more about having a single monolithic application vs a set of specialized applications / services that you can combine.
I believe their original system OOVM did allow for lisp-style (smalltalk-style) interactive development. I don’t know if their new system supports it too.
I don’t know ulisp. I believe with MicroPython you basically have one monolithic Python application running in the interpreter on the device. I believe their claim is that their system enables you to have several applications run in their interpreter with reasonable isolation between them. So I think it’s more about having a single monolithic application vs a set of specialized applications / services that you can combine.
I believe their original system OOVM did allow for lisp-style (smalltalk-style) interactive development. I don’t know if their new system supports it too.