Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The problem with these events is that we should err on the side of caution, since the other side may well be catastrophic.


That's not good risk analysis. Severity is one axis, likelihood of occurring is another.


Which is exactly my point. If something is 100x as bad as the alternative and "only" 10% likely, that's still a very high ~10x expectation of badness.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: