Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I read it the other way; that Twitter were upset about G+ and wouldn't re-sign.

I noted a [deleted] post at the bottom of this thread, where the replies indicate that "Twitter couldn't have known about G+", hence I guess the [deleted] post had similar sentiments to me. Google having social aspirations has been well-known for a long time. I could very much imagine Twitter writing a contract which says that the stream was only available to Google for as long as Google wasn't directly competing with Twitter. Google couldn't sign such a contract. Google+ is direct Twitter competition.




Hasn't buzz always been direct competition?


Yes, but the contract just ended. It wasn't terminated, it just wasn't renewed. And + is a much more «all-in» bet than Buzz was.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: