Do you understand how it is hard to take anything you say in good faith, when you were not able to figure out that a person who spent 10 years in social isolation, may not have a normal social experience, and therefore might not be the best person to get opinions about social topics, if we are looking for the opinion from a person who has a normal social experience?
That someone who has spent a decade in isolation, is probably not the best person to get an opinion on, regarding normal social interations, of normal people?
So, you agree then, that a person who spent a decade in isolation is probably not the best person to get opinions on regarding social interactions regarding the average person?
Use your own definitions, for these words, if you are confused about the definitions of words.
This premise is directly related to my answer here. So there is no possible way that I will be able to describe anything to you, regarding this topic, if you are unable to agree to this other statement.
> So, you agree then, that a person who spent a decade in isolation is probably not the best person to get opinions on regarding social interactions regarding the average person?
Nothing I’ve said indicates agreement with you. It’s odd that you keep saying ‘so you agree’.
> Use your own definitions, for these words…
How will using my own definitions tell me what you mean?
> So there is no possible way that I will be able to describe anything to you, regarding this topic, if you are unable to agree to this other statement.
No, people can understand one another without needing to agree.
I can agree that you think this and that it is part of your argument, but that has nothing to do with me deciding it is true.
The reason you aren’t being understood is that you are are not explaining what your terms mean and why you are using them.
It has nothing to do with whether I agree with you or not.
Sure you have. You have dodged the question. Because you are so intent on dodging this question, I can only assume that it means that you don't have any disagreement with it.
When interacting online with people, I have learned that when someone asks a million questions, and yet will refuse to answer a single question themselves, it is almost always because they have no actual disagreement with that question/statement, and they know it, but they just don't want to admit it.
> How will using my own definitions
It will allow me to understand what your actual misunderstanding is. That's how.
There is no way for me to possibly explain anything to you in this situation, unless I know the actual source of your misunderstanding, and you need to answer that question for me to understand that.
The reason why I know this to be the case, is because in all my interactions with anyone ,in any circumstance, I have never encountered someone who is so incapable of understanding things as you are, therefore, my only option now is to figure out what you mean, to understand your misunderstanding. And to do that, I need your answer to that question.
If you continue to dodge that question, then I really have to go with the most likely explanation, which is that you don't have any disagreement with it, but just don't want to admit it.
You have asked dozens of questions here, and yet you refuse to actually answer this simple one yourself, which is absolutely necessary for me to be able to explain anything to you.
