Alex Oh worked for a law firm which represents Exxon. That law firm was accused of obstructing a deposition to avoid providing answers to the other side. [1]
>ORDERS defense counsel to show cause by May 14, 2021 why sanctions should not be imposed under Rule 11 (b)(3) for alleging that plaintiffs' counsel was agitated, disrespectful, and unhinged during the deposition despite a lack of record evidence supporting those allegations. See Mem. Op. 29-31.
>ORDERS defendants to serve a copy of this order on Ms. Oh.
Was Alex Oh specifically responsible for this conduct? The order doesn't say.
What does this have to do with Clinton? Nothing, except in a six-degrees-of-kevin-bacon sense.
>ORDERS defense counsel to show cause by May 14, 2021 why sanctions should not be imposed under Rule 11 (b)(3) for alleging that plaintiffs' counsel was agitated, disrespectful, and unhinged during the deposition despite a lack of record evidence supporting those allegations. See Mem. Op. 29-31. >ORDERS defendants to serve a copy of this order on Ms. Oh.
Was Alex Oh specifically responsible for this conduct? The order doesn't say.
What does this have to do with Clinton? Nothing, except in a six-degrees-of-kevin-bacon sense.
[1]: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.14559/g...