Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Trust me, it does not have 40 years of architectural advantage, just an advantage. It's not going to take Intel "40 years to catch up" give me break. I have an M1 mini anad it's a great little desktop machine for browsing and light development but it's not 40 years ahead of intel.


This is not the point.

40 years of architectural advantage is X86 electing to forego results of 40 years of advances, and improvements that every other sane ISA had, and instead trying to add them by increasingly complex "workarounds."

Giant transistors counts go to allow X86 cores to not to break ISA compatibility with a 40 years old chip, while trying make new ISA features to live along with it.


Nope. If that were actually true, Alpha, PA-RISC, UltraSPARC, or even Itanium would've killed x86 earlier.


All of above were beating X86 on transistor count/performance for their time. Beating X86 on that was their very point.

Their commercial demise had nothing to do with their hardware.


> great little desktop machine for browsing and light development

Oh come on. You’re making it sound like a toy computer that’s nice for little Debbie who can now watch YouTube videos a little faster.

While my MacBook Air is unplugged, I can edit 4K video in full frame rate for hours and it doesn’t even get warm, let alone hot.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: