That's not what I'm arguing here. If you mean to say you like to take the chance on having your number over a short time go up OR down, and you like to consider gambling, then yes, I'd say Bitcoin is more aligned for that purpose. Also... I did say the word "volatile"... both positive or negative wild volatility are not something you want in an instrument meant to protect your savings. You want slow and steady gains and, most importantly, consistency, so my critique is still valid here.
As the old saying goes "Past performance is no guarantee of future results." Bitcoin could get legislated into oblivion causing a massive decrease in the value of your holdings (especially if world governments take climate change seriously, they may see Bitcoin mining as a major threat), a quantum computer could literally "break" into wallets and steal, Satoshi's wallet could suddenly move and expect billions of USD to be extracted out at once.
Too many variables here to suggest that your savings are secure. You're a braver man (or woman) than I would be.
As the old saying goes "Past performance is no guarantee of future results." Bitcoin could get legislated into oblivion causing a massive decrease in the value of your holdings (especially if world governments take climate change seriously, they may see Bitcoin mining as a major threat), a quantum computer could literally "break" into wallets and steal, Satoshi's wallet could suddenly move and expect billions of USD to be extracted out at once.
Too many variables here to suggest that your savings are secure. You're a braver man (or woman) than I would be.