Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Isn't it standard for quitting senior employees to be paid to sit at home on their notice period? It seems like a bad idea for someone leaving to retain their systems access for 2 weeks... That's Google right really, so unless her last pay cheque was short 2 weeks money, she quit and "worked" her notice from home.



Apparently it went down like

Gebru: I have concerns that I'd like addressed that are important enough to me that I would quit over them, we can talk about it in more depth when I get back from my previously scheduled vacation.

Google: Don't bother coming back, you're no longer an employee.

Just like a threat to fire someone isn't actually firing someone, a threat to quit isn't actually quitting.


Her demands were quite specific and she did list a date.

I'm happy enough to say it's not clear cut quitting. But what's the difference really? She didn't want to stay, they didn't want her to stay, beyond that it's like a couple asking who dumped who.

I probably should have said "leaving employees" in my comment above...


> she did list a date.

Citation?

> I'm happy enough to say it's not clear cut quitting.

It's clear cut firing.

And the difference is that it colors Google's public statements on the matter with their blatant misrepresentation of the facts.


Fact is any company will ever be as good as their executives. People are people, so there's no reason to believe in magic fairy tales. From outside this looks like manager panic, on both sides.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: