Here's my honest feedback: I stopped reading after the author started driving into implementation details without explaining what the purpose of an e-graph is. We got the what, but not the why.
Yea, sorry. I appreciate the feedback. Exactly what Jtsummers said, this is not really a standalone post. I did a bit better motivating the egraph in the first post.
I was able to dive right in and read it. I don’t think every blog post needs to be a standalone document. I’m always surprised at the whiny comments from HN readers like the one above: for a site that likes to act tech savvy, some folks on here are shockingly incapable of using a basic search engine to do their own background reading.
