I agree 240hz is maybe a bit extreme. But I think that most people could immediately tell the difference between 60hz and 120hz.
> but I would probably not care how it looks.
Me too. It's not about aesthetics, I don't care much about it. It's how it feels, slightly higher latency gives me an uncomfortable feeling during computer interaction.
If I had to decide between something that looks very pleasant, but is slow and something that looks crappy but is ultra fast in terms of latency, then I would always pick the latter.
> but I would probably not care how it looks.
Me too. It's not about aesthetics, I don't care much about it. It's how it feels, slightly higher latency gives me an uncomfortable feeling during computer interaction.
If I had to decide between something that looks very pleasant, but is slow and something that looks crappy but is ultra fast in terms of latency, then I would always pick the latter.