Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Thing is 99% of companies could run like SO if their software would be like SO.

But if you are confronted with a very large 15+ year old monolith that requires multiple big instance machines to even handle medium load. Then you're not going to get this easily fixed.

It's very possible that you come to the conclusion that it is too complex to refactor for better vertical scaling. When your demand increases, then you simply buy another machine every now and then and spin up another instance of your monolith.




> if you are confronted with a very large 15+ year old monolith that requires multiple big instance machines to even handle medium load. Then you're not going to get this easily fixed

Last 15+ year old monolith I touched needed multiple machines to run because it was constrained by the database due to an insane homegrown ORM and poorly managed database schemas (and this is a common theme, I find.)

Tuning the SQL, rejigging things like session management, etc., would have made it go a lot quicker on a lot fewer machines but management were insistent that it had to be redone as node microservices under k8s.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: