Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You are being overly literal I guess, there is nothing to explain.

Invalid line of thought sounds good ?

Try DDG next time.




The sentence was unnecessary to both your point and any argument in general. Why did you include it? Why are you defending it's inclusion? Why are you now saying "google it"?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: