Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Actually it's odd. They say that in the Java tuning, they made some simple optimization that got it on par to the original C++ one but then they refused to do anything further; noting instead the same C++ optimization would have applied in Java as well.

Does that mean the java version would have been just as fast? It seems in general though that Java is just as fast as C++ unless you are an ultimate C++ expert.



Indeed, this is ridiculous and makes their final conclusions weaker.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: