Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is the same peer reviewed medical journal that “peer reviewed” a paper based on obviously fake surgisphere data.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...

Kindof seems like those “peers” are human beings who are capable of reviewing things in the direction of their priors.




Do I expect them to be correct all of the time? No.

Do I expect them to be correct most of the time? Absolutely.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: