Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Why is it so unreasonable to suggest that professors might create their own problem sets and tests?

Because creating a problem set or test that 1) is pedagogically useful and 2) solvable in a defined amount of time is a very difficult problem and certainly takes up a lot of time.

My solution to Chegg is to make assignments and tests that you don't need to answer every question for and put a couple REALLY difficult problems on things--technically solvable by the class by effectively not due to complexity/time. In a CS class, it's really easy to create simple looking problems that spiral out of control. I've occasionally done it even when I didn't mean to. :(

Anyone submitting a correct answer to it gets my detailed attention for cheating.

In addition, in a technical track, I do point out that not learning my class, which is a prerequisite, will absolutely kill you in the next class.

Between the fact that the universities that I have worked with will and have expelled people for cheating and the fact that my course is a prerequisite, I seem to have dissuaded the cheaters to take other professors. :)

Alternatively, they're just that good at cheating. Fortunately, the students who need to cheat are generally not smart enough to cheat well, either.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: