Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A more succinct explanation:

Hedge fund has huge unrealized loss that may bankrupt them if they try to buy the shares that they shorted back.

Their broker realizes too late, and if they margin call them now, the hedge fund might not have enough money to pay for the shorts. Thus, the broker will need to pay.

DTCC realizes this, and ups the collateral requirement so that the broker / clearing house has to insure someone will pay (whether it's the broker or hedge fund).

Because DTCC works with all the clearing houses and brokers, the risk from the hedge funds is suddenly everyone's problem to deal with together. By trying to deal with it, they close down trading for retail, and coincidentally aid the hedge funds short position.

Maybe the answer to this is DTCC needing to have collateral requirements per clearing house or broker where they think the risk is highest (the bankrupting hedge funds). Maybe it's regulation to not allow such high leverage or force margin calls faster so the losses can't be too big to fail. Hopefully something is done to fix it!



That's a succinct but false explanation. DTCC does not care if a HF is about to lose a bunch of money and maybe even put a prime brokerage on the hook. Hedge funds make and lose hundreds of billions every week. No prime brokerage would let Melvin end up near insolvency before issuing liquidation margin call and even if there wasn't enough post-liquidation to cover losses, prime brokerages have a collective market cap of more $1 trillion and are easily able to absorb a several billion dollar shortfall. It's obvious to anyone who knows what they're talking about that you are a financial neophyte inventing nonsense conspiracies.


Can you explain why the collateral required is higher (if no one has any insolvency issues)?

If you watch the video I posted in the parent comment with the webull ceo, he states the exact scenario where brokers have no problem margin calling a small retail account, but for a big firm and big losses it's problematic, and so do you have more to add than the webull ceo on this topic?

I encourage the discussion and the information you added. Prime brokerages may be able to absorb the damage and thus are able to post the collateral needed, but then if the smaller brokerages like robinhood also need to post the same collateral while having smaller risk of clearing problems, isn't that the problem of the risk spreading?


A lot of that crowd here, at least on wsb people don't take themselves so seriously!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: