Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You just saw the checks and balance function today - the sitting executive used every trick he could think of to keep himself in power. He was rejected by Congress (the other arm, who he does not control), and this was affirmed by the Judiciary (who he does not control because of the lifetime appointments and other history, despite appointing a number of people aligned with his party to it).

In many countries he could have just insisted (or tell a crony he insists) and that would have been that.




> the sitting executive used every trick he could think of to keep himself in power.

I agree. The checks and balances worked as they were supposed to.

Note that if there was evidence of widespread election fraud, the checks and balances on display here would (hopefully) provide a check on that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: