He doesn't leave us much of a choice, since several Fred Wilson backed companies have (purposely, I think) soured relationships with developers - Twitter, Etsy, probably others.
I don't really think he cares about you, the external developer, as he naturally sees it from the side of the companies who don't wish to have 3rd party developers involved with and depending upon them. Actually, he outlined this in a blog post: http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2010/04/the-twitter-platform.html which basically told us what was coming from Twitter et al. The attitude could also be seen as "Don't be Twitter's bitch, because Twitter doesn't even want you".
I think it's good advice, and pretty much what one has to do these days. It would have been nice if those companies really saw their API developers as partners, though. Things could be different and there could be a really positive symbiotic relationship going on. Instead, they're like sharecroppers, seen as third rate clingers-on. That is how Fred sees developers I'm afraid, and his companies' actions reflect this perspective. Really, in light of how much API developers have contributed to many of these companies, I feel offended.
remember that every company we invest in is a developer. to say that i don't care about developers is to say i don't care about the companies we invest in. that's clearly not true.
I'm thinking third party, API consuming developers specifically. Not that you don't care or dislike these people, only that there that does not appear to be a role for API consumers in the business plans of these companies any longer.
I was pretty disappointed by this statement. But I guess the truth is sometimes painful.
Even if one tries to ignore the hype, there is some grain to the truth that Facebook and Twitter are the "operating systems" of the social web. It is hard working on an OS that keeps taking away system calls based on monetization efforts.
http://spencerfry.com/platforms-are-for-suckers#c-2172711
"spencer
i don't totally agree with you
clearly the web is the platform you want to be building on long term
but building on platforms can get you to scale more quickly and less expensively than building on the open web
if you asked mark pincus if he'd have built zynga on facebook if he could start all over, he'd say yes without even thinking about it
if you asked betaworks if they'd have built bit.ly on twitter if they could start all over, they'd say yes without even thinking about it
if you asked howard lindzon if he'd have built stocktwits on twitter before moving to the open web, he's say yes without even thinking about it
the trick is to understand that platforms are a means to an end not an end in themselves"
I think his comments above may flesh out the point he made on stage (although I didn't see the live video so I can't say for sure).