Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You're not being honest about the situation. None of the official cases were given the chance to be aired, all were dismissed on procedural grounds. The Supreme Court did not "make rulings", they refused to hear the case.

Sadly, that decision may have led to this state of affairs. When people think they have no voice, violence comes soon after.



The Supreme Court rightly ruled that the traitor's case from Texas did not have legal standing.

I'm a Pennsylvanian. Texas should have no right to tell our legislature and government how to run its elections. The Supreme Court rightfully agreed:

> "Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections," the court wrote in an unsigned ruling Friday evening.

But again, you aren't arguing in good faith. I can't wait til Jan 20.


They mostly didn't even provide "evidence" as it could bring their lawyer license in danger.

( If you act in bad faith in court, you can lose your license. I should look up the detail again)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: