> The audacity to say that when your very own blog includes an article titled "People who disagree with you aren't trying to make things complex. Maybe you're wrong."
What point are you trying to make? The point of that article was that the rhetoric about "simplicity" is unproductive, no-one makes a deliberate choice to use something they think is complex. But I didn't make that kind of argument.
> There is a reason relational databases are the standard. It's one of the rare things in computer science actually based on mathematics.
Relational databases are a very finely engineered hammer. But not everything is a nail.
What point are you trying to make? The point of that article was that the rhetoric about "simplicity" is unproductive, no-one makes a deliberate choice to use something they think is complex. But I didn't make that kind of argument.
> There is a reason relational databases are the standard. It's one of the rare things in computer science actually based on mathematics.
Relational databases are a very finely engineered hammer. But not everything is a nail.