nabc sounds good, but i might be inclined to augment it with a "d" that being "disadvantages" in addition to "advantages"
too many times engineers dont think clearly about the negatives of an approach/proposal (every idea has a negative or disadvatageous aspect) and people should go into a proposal with both eyes open
i cant count how many proposals i have seen that have only mentioned advantages and "alternative" approaches similar to the proposed ones...
it’s true. I also thought about adding disadvantages. But alternatives and approach showed them in general. Also, people who comment on RFCs tend to focus on the disadvantages as well. I’ll think about it a bit more.
too many times engineers dont think clearly about the negatives of an approach/proposal (every idea has a negative or disadvatageous aspect) and people should go into a proposal with both eyes open
i cant count how many proposals i have seen that have only mentioned advantages and "alternative" approaches similar to the proposed ones...