If you're spending 30c in lambda, you're probably cheaper than a 5$/mo VPS but I'd argue you'd be covered by heroku (or similar) free tier.
In theory, AWS gives you more tool so you don't have to build / manage software yourself.
In practice, the markup on the tools is significant and you usually pay a premium for devops who know AWS over those who don't.
If you're saving a lot of development time by using AWS tools, it could be worth it, but I haven't seen many companies where that is true.
Maybe it makes more sense in Silicon Valley where tech people are much more expensive.
If you're spending 30c in lambda, you're probably cheaper than a 5$/mo VPS but I'd argue you'd be covered by heroku (or similar) free tier.
In theory, AWS gives you more tool so you don't have to build / manage software yourself.
In practice, the markup on the tools is significant and you usually pay a premium for devops who know AWS over those who don't.
If you're saving a lot of development time by using AWS tools, it could be worth it, but I haven't seen many companies where that is true.
Maybe it makes more sense in Silicon Valley where tech people are much more expensive.