If you actually read it you would see that its Sarah at her best (making good big picture conclusions based on sound evidence) instead of her worst (gossiping shallowly about something she doesn't really understand.)

If I actually read every article she wrote, just to glean the rare gems from the copious garbage, how will I ever get back all the time that was lost?

I'll stick to my original assessment. Down vote away to your heart's content.

"making good big picture conclusions based on sound evidence" .. oh come on, its Sarah creating confrontations where there is simply different styles... and NOW she says that "we the early adopters"... garbage at her best