Yeah I'm already on board with modular functions and functional programming in general. I was wondering about the point free thing. I agree that's like going vegan.
functional programming still allows the usage of functions that are not combinators. So I'm referring to that specifically, not functional programming in general. The OP is recommending functional programming I'm taking it a step further.
It sounds like a combinator is roughly the same thing as a pure function. I'm more familiar with the term pure function, and OP does specifically advocate for pure functions.
No, they refer to different things but can intersect. Not all pure functions are combinators. Just look it up. Haskell is purely functional but it also promotes many patterns that are not combinatorial.
