Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

And furthermore an ad-supported product doesn't necessarily misuse your personal information either. Whether the user pays in dollars or ad impressions doesn't change the need to build a product that people actually want to use, otherwise there is no market for ads to begin with.



> And furthermore an ad-supported product doesn't necessarily misuse your personal information either.

What you mean is they don't necessarily intend to misuse my personal information. The reality is many companies with the best intentions end up spilling that information in a variety of ways.

- They get acquired and their new parent abuses that information.

- They get breeched.

- Employees abuse the information they have access to.

- Employees leak your information to a third party.

- Government employees get access to that information and abuse it.

All of these things have happened to companies where people thought their information was being safely held. Many of these things have happened at the biggest, supposedly secure workplaces. The best way to avoid this is to not put your information out there.


Sure, but these risks aren't specific to businesses that use advertising as a monetization strategy.


The poster I replied to suggested advertising supported companies won't mis-use your data. My point is anyone—advertising company or not—who has my data is a risk.

You're absolutely right, non-advertising companies are a risk too. The difference is most developers who collect $2.99 for their app usually don't ask me for personal information unless they have a need which benefits me.


Ad supported products may not, but the ads themselves most likely do.


A man paying a prostitute doesn't necessarily misuse the prostitute.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: