So you're inferring that iFinex provided information in response to the Subpoena, just based on it having been a while....
Do you have any evidence of iFinex having provided all the relevant financial information relating to their balance sheet to the NYAG (a court filing for example).
All the court filing's I've seen relate to their case state that they're still fighting having to provide their financial information.
Edit: you can read the latest court filing here https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docInde... . Now IANAL but that does not sound to me like the NYAG was given the information needed. And the information they did provide was enough to cause the NYAG to initiate the martin act hearing they're currently contesting.
Do you have any evidence of iFinex having provided all the relevant financial information relating to their balance sheet to the NYAG (a court filing for example).
All the court filing's I've seen relate to their case state that they're still fighting having to provide their financial information.
Edit: you can read the latest court filing here https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docInde... . Now IANAL but that does not sound to me like the NYAG was given the information needed. And the information they did provide was enough to cause the NYAG to initiate the martin act hearing they're currently contesting.