No, I’m suggesting that a company may be pursued for an antitrust remedy even if they have been in continuous violation of it in the beginning.
The argument I would be making here is that Apple used illegally bundled its app distribution system with its hardware, and used anticompetitive actions to enforce it.
E.g. Intel can tell PC manufacturers they must not sell AMD devices, if they started with condition when they made their first sale.
I don’t think the courts will buy this argument. What Apple did from Day 0 was anticompetitive.