Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The subscription model is a true modernized return to the good old ways of creating a product that sells because it’s good quality. How? If a user is not satisfied, they will stop paying. Slack has all the incentives to improve their product, especially in the face of competition.



But you have to take into account the cost of switching/migrating. And possibly lock-in.

So if your customer makes the effort to leave your SaaS, then you know that they were really very much not satisfied.


Perhaps true for a standalone app, but very different for a social one like Slack.

You have to use what others are using.


Is that true? For a social app where every user pays, sure, but Slack is generally paid for by a central business/group/organization. If the users in the organization are sufficiently unhappy with Slack, a functional organization should be unhappy with Slack, and if the organization is unhappy it can migrate everybody elsewhere overnight, with minimal social impact.


If the users in the organization are sufficiently unhappy with Slack, a functional organization should be unhappy with Slack

Nice theory but overwhelmingly disproved by the existence of SAP.


It's also possible that almost all organizations using SAP are dysfunctional.


Is it true though? People could use Slack because other people use it and it is hard to coordinate the switch. Also better the devil you know...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: