Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

cmake generator only needs to be run once per project. After that you use make or ninja directly, and it regenerates the build files if necessary. I can't say it's a strong argument against cmake.



This added user complexity is exactly the argument for plz, though. One of the ideas touted is (to my mind) tight integration, in that plz knows how to handle everything. Whereas cmake just makes project files and leaves it at that.


Are build tools targeted at end-users? Cmake is better for me, the developer, the person who has to build the software


Sadly this doesn’t always work. I have lost loads of time trying to figure this out then doing a clean rebuild.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: