For me, (B) is significant regardless of whether the interference was impactful — and bringing up (B) in response to (A) does not seem disingenuous.
> The other is that the fsb was so wildly successful at it they changes the result of the 2016 election.
Do you have examples of people believing this?
For me, (B) is significant regardless of whether the interference was impactful — and bringing up (B) in response to (A) does not seem disingenuous.
> The other is that the fsb was so wildly successful at it they changes the result of the 2016 election.
Do you have examples of people believing this?