Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

From my perspective, the two things that people mix up are: A. Russia interfering with the election. B. Trump welcoming Russia's interference.

For me, (B) is significant regardless of whether the interference was impactful — and bringing up (B) in response to (A) does not seem disingenuous.

> The other is that the fsb was so wildly successful at it they changes the result of the 2016 election.

Do you have examples of people believing this?



There are replies in this thread that are saying Clinton II lost because of the emails being leaked.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: